Saturday, December 2, 2017

The future of floating cities- and the realities

Floating building in Amsterdam (Credit: Getty Images)

The future of floating cities – and the realities

A collection of technology billionaires, architects and dreamers hope to build neighbourhoods and even city states on the ocean, but they could face some serious barriers. Ellie Cosgrave of the new BBC podcast Tomorrow's World explains.
Every week, a whopping three million new people are moving to live in a city. That’s equivalent to the current population of San Diego or Kiev transplanting themselves into urban areas every seven days; it’s almost a new Moscow or Rio de Janeiro every month.
Tomorrow's World podcast
Listen to the full episode of Tomorrow’s World on floating cities, hosted by Ellie Cosgrave and Britt Wray. Subscribe to the podcast here, which covers everything from artificial intelligence to disease outbreaks.
By 2030, 60% of the world’s population will be living in cities. This is going to put huge strain on the world’s existing metropolises. And they will have climate change to deal with too ­– about 90% of the world’s largest cities are situated on the waterfront and are vulnerable to rising sea levels.
To cope with these changes, some engineers, researchers and technologists say we should reconsider how we build cities; that perhaps it’s time to do something totally different. Instead of building on land, they say, let’s make them float on the ocean.
But is this idea actually feasible? What might these cities look like in reality, and how would they work?
As you can hear in the preview below, these were questions that we explored for a recent episode of the BBC Tomorrow’s World podcast. Along with my fellow presenter Britt Wray, we spoke to designers who are proposing floating cities that could change with the seasons, tech entrepreneurs looking to create settlements on the open ocean and marine engineers who are putting these ideas to the test. Here’s what we found out.
Aquapreneurs
It’s worth remembering that cities have long been encroaching upon the sea as they have searched for space to house their growing populations. In Singapore, for example, 25% of the city is built on reclaimed land, while 20% of Tokyo is built on artificial islands built out into the sea. The authorities in Dubai have built entire luxury complexes on artificial islands while huge tracts of Holland have been reclaimed from the North Sea with an intricate system of levees and dykes that have been protecting urban areas from flooding for centuries.
But rather than trying to hold back the sea from the land, there are some who believe it is time to stop fighting the oceans and to work with them instead. These “aquapreneurs” say the solution to the housing shortages and social problems that exist in many of the world’s cramped, rapidly growing cities can be found by spreading out across the water.
“We have to start living with the water as a friend and not always as an enemy,” says Koen Olthuis, founder of the Dutch architect firm WaterStudio. They are designing and building floating platforms that can act as the foundations to support buildings. Initially they have focused on building single villas or offices, but Olthuis believes it may be possible to construct entire cities in this way.
“Imagine a city where you can plug and play floating houses and floating developments,” he explains. “You could adjust the city for the season… to let the developments breathe.”
Floating cities could be repeatedly remoulded according to the seasons or population changes  
The idea is to build large raft-like structures that can act as floating foundations for buildings, roads, utilities and parkland. While land-based cities are static and cannot be easily remodelled without demolishing buildings, floating cities could be repeatedly remoulded according to the seasons or population changes.
Olthuis points to the natural cooling effect of water as an example – by moving the floating foundations further apart during the hot summer months, a city could be opened up to create channels of water that will cool the air, while closing these gaps in the winter could help to keep the heat in. Or imagine if the city could be temporarily expanded to allow for sporadic population increases from tourism or refugees, shrinking back down again when they leave.
Koen Olthuis (pictured) explains the concept of adaptable floating cities
It is an exciting vision, and one that only works because the city is floating. But Olthuis and his colleagues are also adapting this technology to provide food, sanitation shelter and energy to slums in some of the poorest areas of the world. Many of the world’s slums sit beside large areas of water, making them vulnerable to flooding, but this also provides an opportunity.
WaterStudio has been working with UNESCO to build small floating schools for use in waterside slums. It is being partially funded by a project that has been using solar powered “boat schools” to deliver education to over 70,000 children in Bangladesh.
Olthuis and his team are fixing shipping containers onto floating foundations made from thousands of waste plastic bottles. The first five of these units – forming a classroom, a sanitation unit, a kitchen and a power unit connected to floating solar panels – is due to be delivered to Korail, a slum on the waterfront of Dhaka, in Bangladesh.
The beauty of this approach, according to Olthuis, is that should there be a change in regulations or an eviction from the slum, the school can be reused elsewhere.
“You can put them on a truck and move them to another city,” he says.
Olthuis’s vision of floating cities, however, is one of waterborne conurbations that are still connected to the land by a tether. There are some who dream of severing those ties altogether.
Seavangelists
“We are convinced we can create better worlds on the ocean,” says Joe Quirk, an author and self-proclaimed “seavangelist”. He is also the spokesman for The Seasteading Institute, and hopes to create floating communities that can test innovative forms of governance.
It is going to be very difficult for a tyrant to ascend this sort of natural hierarchy
The group, which was founded in 2008 by economist Patri Friedman and Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel, says that by moving floating cities out into international waters they can create “start-up” nations with their own legal systems. By building these open ocean cities out of 50m-wide (164ft) blocks that can be connected together, it will allow citizens to join and leave at will.
“It is going to be very difficult for a tyrant to ascend this sort of natural hierarchy if your island can disassemble beneath you and people can leave if you are behaving badly,” Quirk told us on the podcast. He believes such waterborne societies will instead be shaped by market forces that will be free of the political ambitions and problems faced by traditional governments on land.
Exactly whether such a political utopia can be achieved remains to be seen – and also whether building societies free of all existing regulation will actually work in practice, given the unpredictability of human nature.
Could floating cities solve the problems raised by global warming and overpopulation?
The Tomorrow's World podcast: your big questions about the future answered
It has also been tried before. In 1967, a pirate radio broadcaster called Roy Bates occupied a former anti-aircraft gun platform in the North Sea and declared it an independent nation called the Principality of Sealand. Although the platform still continues to be occupied, it is not officially recognised as a nation state. According to the United Nations, artificial islands, installations and structures do not possess the status of islands and so cannot have the rights afforded to them.
But there are others who see a far more fundamental barrier to establishing floating states or cities out on the open sea – the weather.
Seavilisation
Any floating community will need to withstand the brutal conditions of the open seas, where waves can reach 20m (65ft) high and storms can rage for days.
“When you are out at sea on waves that high, you can do only one thing, go up and down with them,” says Philip Wilson, a professor of ship dynamics and engineering at the University of Southampton. He is sceptical that it would be possible to build a floating structure at sea that will not be subject to the harsh ocean environment.
“The weather systems at sea are big,” he told us on Tomorrow’s World. “There is a longer fetch for the wind to blow over and as a consequence, the waves are bigger there. If you built a floating city where you are making half the population sea sick, that is not going to be economically viable. People don’t like living like that.”
Quirk points to the giant luxury cruise ships that allow their passengers to enjoy a martini in the evening undisturbed by the pitch and roll of life on the ocean. Oil platforms also manage to remain stable in some fairly inhospitable environments. But even on these, faced with hurricane force winds, they can be pretty unpleasant places to be.
Instead, it seems the future of floating cities may lie somewhat closer to the land. The Seasteading Institute’s first project is to build a high-tech hub of floating islands in the protected waters of a Tahitian lagoon in French Polynesia by 2020. More than 1,000 people have already expressed interest in living there, but at $15 million per module – with perhaps 11 modules providing homes for 200-300 citizens – life there will not be cheap.
The real value of floating cities may lie in providing more space for the world’s overcrowded urban centres to expand into. It seems likely that some form of hybrid city will emerge where we combine the benefits of land-based and floating cities by expanding into nearby waters. As technology improves to help us weather the ups and downs of life on water, these may then start to extend further out into the sea.
Such solutions may be the only way human civilisation can cope with growing populations and changing climates in the future. What is clear to us is that hope definitely floats.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

The rise of the multibillion-dollar corporate campus

(Credit: Getty Images)

The rise of the multibillion-dollar corporate campus

Tech giants like Apple are building vastly expensive headquarters – but university-style spaces have been used by companies for decades, write Agustin Chevez and DJ Huppatz.
My God… It’s heaven.
This was the thought Mae Holland had on her first tour of The Circle’s campus. The landscaping, exercise classes, cafeteria and entertainers had Mae’s head spinning. Compared to the grey cubicle of her previous workplace, the campus was idyllic.
Mae’s workplace in Dave Eggers’s bestselling novel The Circle sounds remarkably similar to Apple’s new “spaceship” campus, also shaped in a giant circle.
The modern corporate campus is the continuation of something that started more than 50 years ago
The corporate campus might have taken its time to work into popular fiction but the idea of getting all your employees together in one giant university-style space is the continuation of something that started more than 50 years ago.
(Credit: Getty Images)
The Steve Jobs Theater at Apple's $5bn campus in Cupertino, California (Credit: Getty Images)
The suburban campus
Early corporate campuses in the United States were originally designed for research scientists and engineers. Surrounded by landscaped gardens or centred around a grassy quadrangle like an Ivy League university, the campus was a safe, serene workplace.
In 1942, communications giant AT&T created the first corporate campus, called Bell Labs in New Jersey. General Motors, General Electric and General Life Insurance followed suit with similar suburban campuses in the 1950s. Early campuses had various names – industrial park, research park or technology park – that emphasised a connection to industry and science on the one hand, and nature on the other.
(Credit: AT&T Archives and History Center)
The Bell Labs campus in New Jersey, taken in 1949 (Credit: AT&T Archives and History Center)
In post-war America, cities were popularly portrayed as “dangerous”, racially divided, crowded and polluted. The suburban campus became a drawcard in “white flight”, as middle class, white Americans fled for the suburbs. Importantly, campuses were only accessible by car.
The lure of the campus
As well as a physical workspace, the campus was a symbolic, cultural and social place. The new campuses were photogenic, promoting the corporation and its values in the media and to potential employees.
The new campuses were photogenic, promoting the corporation and its values in the media and to potential employees
In Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes, Louise Mozingo argued that the campus could “cloak the corporation in high-minded institutional garb”. A university-like campus signalled that this was not simply a business, but an organisation working towards a higher purpose.
A campus also suggested a sense of community. With recreational facilities and social spaces, the low-rise campus aimed, symbolically and practically, to promote interaction and collaboration.
As complete environments, corporate campuses expanded the idea of the workplace by including leisure facilities, cafeterias, shopping and service facilities. Playing tennis and drinking coffee on campus became part of an integrated lifestyle curated by the corporation.
(Credit: Seattle Municipal Archives/Flickr/CC BY-SA)
The top floors of offices were reserved for male managers’ private offices (Credit: Seattle Municipal Archives/Flickr/CC BY-SA)
A paternalistic sense of “family” pervaded the carefully designed “home” for employees. As architect Gordon Bunshaft noted “the head man was personally involved and personally building himself a palace for his people that would not only represent his company, but his personal pleasure”. This translated to office design that typically situated women in open plan floors, with the top floors reserved for male managers’ private offices.
The 21st Century campus
By the 1990s, the possibilities of working from home (or anywhere), outsourcing and offshoring challenged the need for a campus. Committing to so much space represented a liability for businesses in an increasingly digital, economically uncertain environment.
Changing political landscapes also presented challenges. For example, in 2014 RBS bank and Lloyds considered moving to England at a cost of £1bn ($1.34bn) to each company to manage the “irreversible risk” created by Scotland’s independence plebiscite.
Natural disasters and terrorism also raise questions about centralising an organisation in a single location. Given these risks, why would Apple build a $5bn campus?
The compressed culture of the campus can promote the idea that work is fun, but the reality might still be sitting for long hours in front of a computer screen
The 21st Century Silicon Valley model, complete with sports and recreational facilities, free cafeterias, healthcare and commuter buses – as well as institutionalised casual dress and flexible working hours - seems to be an ideal egalitarian workplace. Indeed, a study identified “having a corporate campus” as a critical factor in attracting and retaining staff.
The compressed culture of the campus can promote the idea that work is fun, palaces of informality to house workers driven by a belief in a technologically-driven utopia. But the reality might still be sitting for long hours in front of a computer screen.
(Credit: Alamy)
Protesters attack a Google bus piñata in in San Francisco in 2013 (Credit: Alamy)
Campuses can also be exclusive utopias with limited interactions with their surroundings. Private buses shuttling employees to the Google campus have been the source of community resentment and social conflict.
Just as “white flight” contributed to the suburban low-rise and the horizontal corporate campus, the shift from rural to urban environments is shaping the vertical campus. For example, Chinese internet provider Tencent’s campus rises 250m above ground, it’s a new model driven by necessity in constrained cities.
Not limited to tech firms, the corporate campus has been embraced by airlines like Qantas and financial institutions like ANZ. Swiss-based pharmaceutical Novartis campus is building a campus composed of buildings by high-profile architects with construction scheduled until 2030.
(Credit: Alamy)
The Basel headquarters of pharma giant Novartis includes a 32,000 sq m Frank Gehry office building (Credit: Alamy)
And the Spanish-based Telefonica campus hosts 14,000 employees, a population higher than that of 90% of Australian towns.
But corporate campuses are not simply big offices. Their popularity over the past fifty years suggests the form is here to stay. A central campus offers an organisation the opportunity to materialise their culture, brand and sense of purpose in the physical landscape.
For employees, it is not just a place to work, but a place they will want to stay and play, eat and socialise. But, as Mae discovers in The Circle, the campus might not be turn out to be the utopia it appears to be.
Agustin Chevez is the adjunct research fellow at the Centre For Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology. DJ Huppatz is the acting director of architecture, Swinburne University of Technology. This article was originally published at The Conversation and has been republished under Creative Commons.

Saturday, September 30, 2017

33 Ideas that will change the world